Appraise

Who vouched for the work, in their own words.

Name a paper. Get back the academicians and society fellows who have cited it, the sentence each of them wrote, and a paragraph you can put in a report — every line of it traceable to the English original.

appraise · free sample, no key
askBGE-M3
papers search no title match
citation aliases 74 references agree

Recognised as arxiv:2402.03216 · M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity…

The name people use is not in the paper’s own title — it lives in other people’s bibliographies. Both lanes run at once; the aliases win here.

0academicians and fellows
0citing papers
0citation sentences

16 positive · 88 neutral · 2 negative — the negative ones are returned too

“More recently, powerful cross-encoder rerankers, such as BGE-reranker-v2-m3 (BGE) (Chen et al., 2024), have significantly improved retrieval accuracy.”

James AllanACM Fellow · University of Massachusetts Amherstendorse

“Strong results are achieved with bge-Gemma2 using layer-normalized average embeddings, our best-performing model.”

Ming-Yu LiuIEEE Fellow · NVIDIA Cosmos Labbuild on

“Local Search Engine: We adopt BGE-M3 (Chen et al., 2024) for hybrid retrieval, which produces both dense and learned sparse embeddings in a single forward pass.”

陈为 · Wei ChenCCF Fellow · Zhejiang Universitybuild on

The work has been cited 106 times by 55 academicians and society fellows, 16 of those citations carrying an explicit endorsement. ACM Fellow James Allan describes it as a powerful cross-encoder reranker that “significantly improved retrieval accuracy”; IEEE Fellow Ming-Yu Liu reports it as their best-performing model; CCF Fellow Wei Chen adopts it as the retrieval engine of their own system.

Each sentence keeps its English original and the paper it came from. search 163 ms · read 27 ms · draft 4.3 s.

What it answers

Who cited it
Across 5,427 academicians and society fellows — CAS, CAE, NAS, NAE, the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, ACM, IEEE, AAAI, ACL, AAAS, IAPR, CCF.
What they said
The sentence itself, classified by type — endorse, build on, baseline, exemplar, critique, background — and by stance.
Written up
ask turns the sentences into a Chinese or English paragraph for a report, a promotion file or an award submission.

Three calls

The free sample runs without a key: query BGE-M3, id arxiv:2402.03216.

Recognise and summarise
POST https://api.1stauthor.com/v1/appraise/search {"query": "BGE-M3"}
The roster and the sentences
GET https://api.1stauthor.com/v1/appraise/read/arxiv:2402.03216
Write it up
POST https://api.1stauthor.com/v1/appraise/ask {"query": "…", "effort": "medium"}

Narrow it — org=CAS,CAE for Chinese academies · stance=positive · type=endorse,buildon · min_h_index=100 · honoree=<name> · section=related work · max_sentences=3

What it will not do

The roster is those 5,427 people, not everyone who ever cited you; the sentences come from their own papers; negative citations are returned, not filtered out. A name that no bibliography agrees on may resolve to the wrong paper — the other candidates come back with it, so you can correct the choice.

Ask it about your own paper

Free sample without a key; a key takes a minute.